Libya vs Uganda: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Libya
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 157.8 2015 = 100 against 156.6 2015 = 100 in Libya, a difference of 1.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Uganda ahead.
Libya ranks 35th and Uganda ranks 33rd of 207 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 48.58 2015 = 100 | 119.7 2015 = 100 | 71.12 2015 = 100 | Uganda |
| 2000s | 83.26 2015 = 100 | 70.42 2015 = 100 | 12.84 2015 = 100 | Libya |
| 2010s | 140.15 2015 = 100 | 104.97 2015 = 100 | 35.18 2015 = 100 | Libya |
| 2020s | 147.26 2015 = 100 | 133.92 2015 = 100 | 13.34 2015 = 100 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Libya or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 157.8 2015 = 100 against 156.6 2015 = 100 in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Libya and Uganda?
- 1.2 2015 = 100, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Uganda?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Uganda rank globally for export unit value index?
- Libya ranks 35th and Uganda ranks 33rd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.