Madagascar vs Pakistan: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Madagascar
- Pakistan
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 104.3 2015 = 100 against 101.2 2015 = 100 in Pakistan, a difference of 3.1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Pakistan ahead.
Madagascar ranks 190th and Pakistan ranks 193rd of 207 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 47.99 2015 = 100 | 67.79 2015 = 100 | 19.8 2015 = 100 | Pakistan |
| 1990s | 59.82 2015 = 100 | 72.49 2015 = 100 | 12.67 2015 = 100 | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 75.75 2015 = 100 | 69.89 2015 = 100 | 5.86 2015 = 100 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 98.17 2015 = 100 | 95.65 2015 = 100 | 2.52 2015 = 100 | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 101.42 2015 = 100 | 86.22 2015 = 100 | 15.2 2015 = 100 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Madagascar or Pakistan?
- Madagascar, at 104.3 2015 = 100 against 101.2 2015 = 100 in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Madagascar and Pakistan?
- 3.1 2015 = 100, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Pakistan?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Madagascar and Pakistan rank globally for export unit value index?
- Madagascar ranks 190th and Pakistan ranks 193rd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.