Mauritania vs Zambia: Export unit value index (2015 = 100)
Export unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Mauritania
- Zambia
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 181.8 2015 = 100 against 178.8 2015 = 100 in Zambia, a difference of 3 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zambia ahead.
Mauritania ranks 22nd and Zambia ranks 24th of 208 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 44.44 2015 = 100 | 66.78 2015 = 100 | 22.34 2015 = 100 | Zambia |
| 1990s | 58.44 2015 = 100 | 75.06 2015 = 100 | 16.62 2015 = 100 | Zambia |
| 2000s | 60.3 2015 = 100 | 73.96 2015 = 100 | 13.66 2015 = 100 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 131.58 2015 = 100 | 118.69 2015 = 100 | 12.89 2015 = 100 | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 156.68 2015 = 100 | 156.45 2015 = 100 | 0.2333 2015 = 100 | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Mauritania or Zambia?
- Mauritania, at 181.8 2015 = 100 against 178.8 2015 = 100 in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Mauritania and Zambia?
- 3 2015 = 100, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zambia?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Mauritania and Zambia rank globally for export unit value index?
- Mauritania ranks 22nd and Zambia ranks 24th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.