Myanmar vs Nigeria: Export unit value index (2015 = 100)
Export unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Myanmar
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 155.8 2015 = 100 against 153.8 2015 = 100 in Myanmar, a difference of 2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 55th and Nigeria ranks 52nd of 208 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 2 and Nigeria in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 79.21 2015 = 100 | 27.5 2015 = 100 | 51.71 2015 = 100 | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 84.35 2015 = 100 | 34.99 2015 = 100 | 49.36 2015 = 100 | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 85.83 2015 = 100 | 93.73 2015 = 100 | 7.9 2015 = 100 | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 102.89 2015 = 100 | 140.85 2015 = 100 | 37.96 2015 = 100 | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 144.15 2015 = 100 | 153.97 2015 = 100 | 9.82 2015 = 100 | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Myanmar or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 155.8 2015 = 100 against 153.8 2015 = 100 in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Myanmar and Nigeria?
- 2 2015 = 100, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Nigeria?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
- How do Myanmar and Nigeria rank globally for export unit value index?
- Myanmar ranks 55th and Nigeria ranks 52nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.