Northern Mariana Islands vs Romania: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Northern Mariana Islands
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 145.7 2015 = 100 against 145.6 2015 = 100 in Northern Mariana Islands, a difference of 0.1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Romania ahead.
Northern Mariana Islands ranks 69th and Romania ranks 68th of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Northern Mariana Islands averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Mariana Islands | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.71 2015 = 100 | 82.42 2015 = 100 | 63.71 2015 = 100 | Romania |
| 2010s | 122.32 2015 = 100 | 111.08 2015 = 100 | 11.24 2015 = 100 | Northern Mariana Islands |
| 2020s | 151.7 2015 = 100 | 136.62 2015 = 100 | 15.08 2015 = 100 | Northern Mariana Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Northern Mariana Islands or Romania?
- Romania, at 145.7 2015 = 100 against 145.6 2015 = 100 in Northern Mariana Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Northern Mariana Islands and Romania?
- 0.1 2015 = 100, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Mariana Islands and Romania?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Northern Mariana Islands and Romania rank globally for export unit value index?
- Northern Mariana Islands ranks 69th and Romania ranks 68th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.