Oman vs Thailand: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Oman
- Thailand
How they compare
Oman currently reports 118.4 2015 = 100 against 117.3 2015 = 100 in Thailand, a difference of 1.1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Thailand ahead.
Oman ranks 163rd and Thailand ranks 165th of 207 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 3 and Thailand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 45.89 2015 = 100 | 56.16 2015 = 100 | 10.27 2015 = 100 | Thailand |
| 1990s | 29.3 2015 = 100 | 73.09 2015 = 100 | 43.79 2015 = 100 | Thailand |
| 2000s | 83.36 2015 = 100 | 74.08 2015 = 100 | 9.28 2015 = 100 | Oman |
| 2010s | 130.54 2015 = 100 | 103.81 2015 = 100 | 26.73 2015 = 100 | Oman |
| 2020s | 117.56 2015 = 100 | 112.7 2015 = 100 | 4.86 2015 = 100 | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Oman or Thailand?
- Oman, at 118.4 2015 = 100 against 117.3 2015 = 100 in Thailand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Oman and Thailand?
- 1.1 2015 = 100, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Thailand?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Oman and Thailand rank globally for export unit value index?
- Oman ranks 163rd and Thailand ranks 165th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.