Peru vs Tanzania: Export unit value index (2015 = 100)
Export unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Peru
- Tanzania
How they compare
Peru currently reports 172.7 2015 = 100 against 170.5 2015 = 100 in Tanzania, a difference of 2.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Tanzania ahead.
Peru ranks 30th and Tanzania ranks 33rd of 208 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 36.27 2015 = 100 | 48.53 2015 = 100 | 12.27 2015 = 100 | Tanzania |
| 1990s | 38.26 2015 = 100 | 56.03 2015 = 100 | 17.77 2015 = 100 | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 62.48 2015 = 100 | 68.43 2015 = 100 | 5.95 2015 = 100 | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 125.5 2015 = 100 | 109.37 2015 = 100 | 16.13 2015 = 100 | Peru |
| 2020s | 134.85 2015 = 100 | 138.15 2015 = 100 | 3.3 2015 = 100 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Peru or Tanzania?
- Peru, at 172.7 2015 = 100 against 170.5 2015 = 100 in Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Peru and Tanzania?
- 2.2 2015 = 100, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Tanzania?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2025.
- How do Peru and Tanzania rank globally for export unit value index?
- Peru ranks 30th and Tanzania ranks 33rd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.