Solomon Islands vs Tonga: Export unit value index (2015 = 100)
Export unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Solomon Islands
- Tonga
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 112.8 2015 = 100 against 110.6 2015 = 100 in Tonga, a difference of 2.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tonga ahead.
Solomon Islands ranks 178th and Tonga ranks 180th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.19 2015 = 100 | 93.01 2015 = 100 | 13.82 2015 = 100 | Tonga |
| 2010s | 103.66 2015 = 100 | 103.43 2015 = 100 | 0.23 2015 = 100 | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 101.15 2015 = 100 | 106.92 2015 = 100 | 5.77 2015 = 100 | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Solomon Islands or Tonga?
- Solomon Islands, at 112.8 2015 = 100 against 110.6 2015 = 100 in Tonga as of 2025.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Solomon Islands and Tonga?
- 2.2 2015 = 100, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Tonga?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Solomon Islands and Tonga rank globally for export unit value index?
- Solomon Islands ranks 178th and Tonga ranks 180th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.