Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Sudan: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 127.3 2015 = 100 against 127.2 2015 = 100 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 130th and Sudan ranks 129th of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 110.2 2015 = 100 | 95.22 2015 = 100 | 14.98 2015 = 100 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 108.78 2015 = 100 | 123.45 2015 = 100 | 14.67 2015 = 100 | Sudan |
| 2020s | 120.24 2015 = 100 | 125.5 2015 = 100 | 5.26 2015 = 100 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 127.3 2015 = 100 against 127.2 2015 = 100 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sudan?
- 0.1 2015 = 100, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sudan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sudan rank globally for export unit value index?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 130th and Sudan ranks 129th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.