Albania vs Greenland: Export volume index
Export volume index over time
- Albania
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 178.3 2015 = 100 against 166.9 2015 = 100 in Albania, a difference of 11.4 2015 = 100.
That makes Greenland's figure about 1.1 times Albania's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Albania ranks 32nd and Greenland ranks 29th of 204 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.56 2015 = 100 | 137.58 2015 = 100 | 80.02 2015 = 100 | Greenland |
| 2010s | 105.91 2015 = 100 | 136.88 2015 = 100 | 30.97 2015 = 100 | Greenland |
| 2020s | 149.76 2015 = 100 | 189.52 2015 = 100 | 39.76 2015 = 100 | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export volume index, Albania or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 178.3 2015 = 100 against 166.9 2015 = 100 in Albania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export volume index between Albania and Greenland?
- 11.4 2015 = 100, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Greenland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Albania and Greenland rank globally for export volume index?
- Albania ranks 32nd and Greenland ranks 29th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.