Albania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Export volume index
Export volume index over time
- Albania
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Albania currently reports 166.9 2015 = 100 against 160 2015 = 100 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 6.9 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Albania ranks 32nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 35th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.56 2015 = 100 | 61.96 2015 = 100 | 4.4 2015 = 100 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 105.91 2015 = 100 | 97.64 2015 = 100 | 8.27 2015 = 100 | Albania |
| 2020s | 149.76 2015 = 100 | 145.68 2015 = 100 | 4.08 2015 = 100 | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export volume index, Albania or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Albania, at 166.9 2015 = 100 against 160 2015 = 100 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export volume index between Albania and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 6.9 2015 = 100, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Albania and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for export volume index?
- Albania ranks 32nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 35th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.