Angola vs Malawi: Export volume index

Angola
74.2 2015 = 100
in 2024
Malawi
73.9 2015 = 100
in 2024
Angola rank
175th
Malawi rank
176th

Export volume index over time

  • Angola
  • Malawi
0255075100125200520142024

How they compare

Angola currently reports 74.2 2015 = 100 against 73.9 2015 = 100 in Malawi, a difference of 0.3 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malawi ahead.

Angola ranks 175th and Malawi ranks 176th of 204 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Malawi Difference Ahead
2000s 91.36 2015 = 100 94.84 2015 = 100 3.48 2015 = 100 Malawi
2010s 94.87 2015 = 100 99.16 2015 = 100 4.29 2015 = 100 Malawi
2020s 73.54 2015 = 100 81.16 2015 = 100 7.62 2015 = 100 Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher export volume index, Angola or Malawi?
Angola, at 74.2 2015 = 100 against 73.9 2015 = 100 in Malawi as of 2024.
What is the difference in export volume index between Angola and Malawi?
0.3 2015 = 100, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Malawi?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Angola and Malawi rank globally for export volume index?
Angola ranks 175th and Malawi ranks 176th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Export volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.