Aruba vs Equatorial Guinea: Export volume index
Export volume index over time
- Aruba
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 40.1 2015 = 100 against 39.1 2015 = 100 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 199th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 200th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,844 2015 = 100 | 137.62 2015 = 100 | 1,706 2015 = 100 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 289.73 2015 = 100 | 131.38 2015 = 100 | 158.35 2015 = 100 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 37.84 2015 = 100 | 47.88 2015 = 100 | 10.04 2015 = 100 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export volume index, Aruba or Equatorial Guinea?
- Aruba, at 40.1 2015 = 100 against 39.1 2015 = 100 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export volume index between Aruba and Equatorial Guinea?
- 1 2015 = 100, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Equatorial Guinea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for export volume index?
- Aruba ranks 199th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 200th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.