Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Laos: Export volume index
Export volume index over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 129.9 2015 = 100 against 128.8 2015 = 100 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1.1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 67th and Laos ranks 64th of 204 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.26 2015 = 100 | 24.3 2015 = 100 | 51.96 2015 = 100 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 105.93 2015 = 100 | 87.46 2015 = 100 | 18.47 2015 = 100 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 127.66 2015 = 100 | 122.98 2015 = 100 | 4.68 2015 = 100 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export volume index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Laos?
- Laos, at 129.9 2015 = 100 against 128.8 2015 = 100 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export volume index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Laos?
- 1.1 2015 = 100, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Laos?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Laos rank globally for export volume index?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 67th and Laos ranks 64th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.