Colombia vs Hong Kong, China: Export volume index
Export volume index over time
- Colombia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 98.5 2015 = 100 against 97.5 2015 = 100 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Colombia ranks 139th and Hong Kong, China ranks 141st of 204 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.58 2015 = 100 | 79.9 2015 = 100 | 13.32 2015 = 100 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 94 2015 = 100 | 100.17 2015 = 100 | 6.17 2015 = 100 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 94.66 2015 = 100 | 102.1 2015 = 100 | 7.44 2015 = 100 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export volume index, Colombia or Hong Kong, China?
- Colombia, at 98.5 2015 = 100 against 97.5 2015 = 100 in Hong Kong, China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export volume index between Colombia and Hong Kong, China?
- 1 2015 = 100, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Hong Kong, China?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for export volume index?
- Colombia ranks 139th and Hong Kong, China ranks 141st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.