Croatia vs Egypt: Export volume index

Croatia
147 2015 = 100
in 2024
Egypt
145.8 2015 = 100
in 2024
Croatia rank
45th
Egypt rank
47th

Export volume index over time

  • Croatia
  • Egypt
050100150200520142024

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 147 2015 = 100 against 145.8 2015 = 100 in Egypt, a difference of 1.2 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 45th and Egypt ranks 47th of 204 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Egypt Difference Ahead
2000s 80.86 2015 = 100 87.54 2015 = 100 6.68 2015 = 100 Egypt
2010s 96.93 2015 = 100 114.13 2015 = 100 17.2 2015 = 100 Egypt
2020s 134.84 2015 = 100 143.78 2015 = 100 8.94 2015 = 100 Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher export volume index, Croatia or Egypt?
Croatia, at 147 2015 = 100 against 145.8 2015 = 100 in Egypt as of 2024.
What is the difference in export volume index between Croatia and Egypt?
1.2 2015 = 100, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Egypt?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Croatia and Egypt rank globally for export volume index?
Croatia ranks 45th and Egypt ranks 47th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Export volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.