Cuba vs Equatorial Guinea: Export volume index
Export volume index over time
- Cuba
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 39.1 2015 = 100 against 35.8 2015 = 100 in Cuba, a difference of 3.3 2015 = 100.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Cuba ranks 201st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 200th of 204 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.02 2015 = 100 | 137.62 2015 = 100 | 49.6 2015 = 100 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 103.66 2015 = 100 | 131.38 2015 = 100 | 27.72 2015 = 100 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 43.54 2015 = 100 | 47.88 2015 = 100 | 4.34 2015 = 100 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export volume index, Cuba or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 39.1 2015 = 100 against 35.8 2015 = 100 in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export volume index between Cuba and Equatorial Guinea?
- 3.3 2015 = 100, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Equatorial Guinea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for export volume index?
- Cuba ranks 201st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 200th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.