Ecuador vs Iraq: Export volume index

Ecuador
129.9 2015 = 100
in 2024
Iraq
129 2015 = 100
in 2024
Ecuador rank
64th
Iraq rank
66th

Export volume index over time

  • Ecuador
  • Iraq
406080100120200520142024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 129.9 2015 = 100 against 129 2015 = 100 in Iraq, a difference of 0.9 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 64th and Iraq ranks 66th of 204 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Iraq Difference Ahead
2000s 75.82 2015 = 100 53.24 2015 = 100 22.58 2015 = 100 Ecuador
2010s 94.46 2015 = 100 91.72 2015 = 100 2.74 2015 = 100 Ecuador
2020s 119.66 2015 = 100 119.32 2015 = 100 0.34 2015 = 100 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher export volume index, Ecuador or Iraq?
Ecuador, at 129.9 2015 = 100 against 129 2015 = 100 in Iraq as of 2024.
What is the difference in export volume index between Ecuador and Iraq?
0.9 2015 = 100, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Iraq?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Iraq rank globally for export volume index?
Ecuador ranks 64th and Iraq ranks 66th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Export volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.