Faroe Islands vs Solomon Islands: Export volume index
Export volume index over time
- Faroe Islands
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 144.5 2015 = 100 against 142 2015 = 100 in Faroe Islands, a difference of 2.5 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 53rd and Solomon Islands ranks 52nd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.62 2015 = 100 | 46.08 2015 = 100 | 40.54 2015 = 100 | Faroe Islands |
| 2010s | 107.79 2015 = 100 | 120.29 2015 = 100 | 12.5 2015 = 100 | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 134.26 2015 = 100 | 117 2015 = 100 | 17.26 2015 = 100 | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export volume index, Faroe Islands or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 144.5 2015 = 100 against 142 2015 = 100 in Faroe Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export volume index between Faroe Islands and Solomon Islands?
- 2.5 2015 = 100, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Solomon Islands?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Faroe Islands and Solomon Islands rank globally for export volume index?
- Faroe Islands ranks 53rd and Solomon Islands ranks 52nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.