French Polynesia vs South Korea: Export volume index
Export volume index over time
- French Polynesia
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 127.1 2015 = 100 against 125.3 2015 = 100 in French Polynesia, a difference of 1.8 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was French Polynesia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 72nd and South Korea ranks 70th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 2 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 229.4 2015 = 100 | 55.5 2015 = 100 | 173.9 2015 = 100 | French Polynesia |
| 2010s | 133.97 2015 = 100 | 95.83 2015 = 100 | 38.14 2015 = 100 | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | 106.54 2015 = 100 | 117.04 2015 = 100 | 10.5 2015 = 100 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export volume index, French Polynesia or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 127.1 2015 = 100 against 125.3 2015 = 100 in French Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export volume index between French Polynesia and South Korea?
- 1.8 2015 = 100, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and South Korea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do French Polynesia and South Korea rank globally for export volume index?
- French Polynesia ranks 72nd and South Korea ranks 70th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.