Gibraltar vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Export volume index
Export volume index over time
- Gibraltar
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 48.1 2015 = 100 against 47.4 2015 = 100 in Gibraltar, a difference of 0.7 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gibraltar ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 196th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 195th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.56 2015 = 100 | 68.08 2015 = 100 | 18.48 2015 = 100 | Gibraltar |
| 2010s | 85.23 2015 = 100 | 86.41 2015 = 100 | 1.18 2015 = 100 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 106.98 2015 = 100 | 61.04 2015 = 100 | 45.94 2015 = 100 | Gibraltar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export volume index, Gibraltar or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 48.1 2015 = 100 against 47.4 2015 = 100 in Gibraltar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export volume index between Gibraltar and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.7 2015 = 100, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Gibraltar and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for export volume index?
- Gibraltar ranks 196th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 195th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.