Greenland vs Kyrgyzstan: Export volume index
Export volume index over time
- Greenland
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 183.9 2015 = 100 against 178.3 2015 = 100 in Greenland, a difference of 5.6 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Greenland ahead.
Greenland ranks 29th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 26th of 204 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 137.58 2015 = 100 | 92.54 2015 = 100 | 45.04 2015 = 100 | Greenland |
| 2010s | 136.88 2015 = 100 | 117.55 2015 = 100 | 19.33 2015 = 100 | Greenland |
| 2020s | 189.52 2015 = 100 | 148.94 2015 = 100 | 40.58 2015 = 100 | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export volume index, Greenland or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 183.9 2015 = 100 against 178.3 2015 = 100 in Greenland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export volume index between Greenland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5.6 2015 = 100, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Greenland and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for export volume index?
- Greenland ranks 29th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 26th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.