Guam vs Latvia: Export volume index

Guam
111.3 2015 = 100
in 2024
Latvia
111.6 2015 = 100
in 2024
Guam rank
103rd
Latvia rank
102nd

Export volume index over time

  • Guam
  • Latvia
50100150200250200520142024

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 111.6 2015 = 100 against 111.3 2015 = 100 in Guam, a difference of 0.3 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guam ahead.

Guam ranks 103rd and Latvia ranks 102nd of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 199.94 2015 = 100 61.38 2015 = 100 138.56 2015 = 100 Guam
2010s 101.64 2015 = 100 99.69 2015 = 100 1.95 2015 = 100 Guam
2020s 112.6 2015 = 100 120.26 2015 = 100 7.66 2015 = 100 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher export volume index, Guam or Latvia?
Latvia, at 111.6 2015 = 100 against 111.3 2015 = 100 in Guam as of 2024.
What is the difference in export volume index between Guam and Latvia?
0.3 2015 = 100, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Latvia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Guam and Latvia rank globally for export volume index?
Guam ranks 103rd and Latvia ranks 102nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Export volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.