Japan vs Romania: Export volume index

Japan
112.6 2015 = 100
in 2024
Romania
113.6 2015 = 100
in 2024
Japan rank
99th
Romania rank
97th

Export volume index over time

  • Japan
  • Romania
0255075100125200520142024

How they compare

Romania currently reports 113.6 2015 = 100 against 112.6 2015 = 100 in Japan, a difference of 1 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 99th and Romania ranks 97th of 204 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 92.2 2015 = 100 63.04 2015 = 100 29.16 2015 = 100 Japan
2010s 102.26 2015 = 100 97.79 2015 = 100 4.47 2015 = 100 Japan
2020s 110.52 2015 = 100 109.68 2015 = 100 0.84 2015 = 100 Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher export volume index, Japan or Romania?
Romania, at 113.6 2015 = 100 against 112.6 2015 = 100 in Japan as of 2024.
What is the difference in export volume index between Japan and Romania?
1 2015 = 100, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Romania?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Japan and Romania rank globally for export volume index?
Japan ranks 99th and Romania ranks 97th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Export volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.