Latvia vs Marshall Islands: Export volume index
Export volume index over time
- Latvia
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 111.6 2015 = 100 against 111.3 2015 = 100 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.3 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Latvia ranks 102nd and Marshall Islands ranks 103rd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Marshall Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.38 2015 = 100 | 48.96 2015 = 100 | 12.42 2015 = 100 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 99.69 2015 = 100 | 108.02 2015 = 100 | 8.33 2015 = 100 | Marshall Islands |
| 2020s | 120.26 2015 = 100 | 130.9 2015 = 100 | 10.64 2015 = 100 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export volume index, Latvia or Marshall Islands?
- Latvia, at 111.6 2015 = 100 against 111.3 2015 = 100 in Marshall Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export volume index between Latvia and Marshall Islands?
- 0.3 2015 = 100, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Marshall Islands?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Marshall Islands rank globally for export volume index?
- Latvia ranks 102nd and Marshall Islands ranks 103rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.