Macao vs Malta: Export volume index

Macao
103 2015 = 100
in 2024
Malta
102.2 2015 = 100
in 2024
Macao rank
126th
Malta rank
128th

Export volume index over time

  • Macao
  • Malta
50100150200200520142024

How they compare

Macao currently reports 103 2015 = 100 against 102.2 2015 = 100 in Malta, a difference of 0.8 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Macao ahead.

Macao ranks 126th and Malta ranks 128th of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Macao averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 173.04 2015 = 100 114.54 2015 = 100 58.5 2015 = 100 Macao
2010s 88.47 2015 = 100 107.62 2015 = 100 19.15 2015 = 100 Malta
2020s 102.76 2015 = 100 89.26 2015 = 100 13.5 2015 = 100 Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher export volume index, Macao or Malta?
Macao, at 103 2015 = 100 against 102.2 2015 = 100 in Malta as of 2024.
What is the difference in export volume index between Macao and Malta?
0.8 2015 = 100, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Malta?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Macao and Malta rank globally for export volume index?
Macao ranks 126th and Malta ranks 128th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Export volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.