Moldova vs Sao Tome and Principe: Export volume index (2015 = 100)
Export volume index (2015 = 100) over time
- Moldova
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 160 2015 = 100 against 155.4 2015 = 100 in Moldova, a difference of 4.6 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Moldova ranks 37th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 35th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.98 2015 = 100 | 61.96 2015 = 100 | 9.98 2015 = 100 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 101.91 2015 = 100 | 97.64 2015 = 100 | 4.27 2015 = 100 | Moldova |
| 2020s | 149.18 2015 = 100 | 145.68 2015 = 100 | 3.5 2015 = 100 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export volume index, Moldova or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 160 2015 = 100 against 155.4 2015 = 100 in Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export volume index between Moldova and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 4.6 2015 = 100, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Moldova and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for export volume index?
- Moldova ranks 37th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 35th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the export value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.