Antigua and Barbuda vs Cameroon: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score

Antigua and Barbuda
43.75
in 2013
Cameroon
43.75
in 2013
Antigua and Barbuda rank
117th
Cameroon rank
117th

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Cameroon
010203040200420082013

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 43.75 against 43.75 in Cameroon, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 117th and Cameroon ranks 117th of 181 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Cameroon Difference Ahead
2000s 43.75 18.75 25 Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 43.75 35.94 7.81 Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Cameroon?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 43.75 against 43.75 in Cameroon as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Cameroon?
0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Cameroon?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Cameroon rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 117th and Cameroon ranks 117th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,785 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.