Antigua and Barbuda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
43.75
in 2013
Tanzania, United Republic of
43.75
in 2013
Antigua and Barbuda rank
118th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
118th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 43.75 against 43.75 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 118th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 118th of 183 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.75 | 43.75 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 43.75 | 43.75 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 43.75 against 43.75 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 118th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 118th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.