Australia vs Hong Kong, China: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Australia
93.75
in 2013
Hong Kong, China
93.75
in 2013
Australia rank
3rd
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Australia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Australia currently reports 93.75 against 93.75 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 3rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.5 | 93.75 | 6.25 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 90.62 | 93.75 | 3.12 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Australia or Hong Kong, China?
- Australia, at 93.75 against 93.75 in Hong Kong, China as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Australia and Hong Kong, China?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Hong Kong, China?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Australia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 3rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.