Australia vs Singapore: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Australia
93.75
in 2013
Singapore
93.75
in 2013
Australia rank
3rd
Singapore rank
3rd
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Australia
- Singapore
How they compare
Australia currently reports 93.75 against 93.75 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.5 | 81.25 | 6.25 | Australia |
| 2010s | 90.62 | 89.06 | 1.56 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Australia or Singapore?
- Australia, at 93.75 against 93.75 in Singapore as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Australia and Singapore?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Singapore?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Australia and Singapore rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.