Bahamas vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Bahamas
56.25
in 2013
Bosnia and Herzegovina
56.25
in 2013
Bahamas rank
80th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
80th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Bahamas
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 80th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 80th of 184 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.25 | 62.5 | 6.25 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 56.25 | 59.38 | 3.12 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Bahamas or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Bahamas, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Bahamas and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2013.
- How do Bahamas and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Bahamas ranks 80th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 80th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.