Bangladesh vs Central African Republic: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Bangladesh
37.5
in 2013
Central African Republic
37.5
in 2013
Bangladesh rank
139th
Central African Republic rank
139th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 139th and Central African Republic ranks 139th of 184 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.62 | 18.75 | 21.88 | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 37.5 | 32.81 | 4.69 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Bangladesh or Central African Republic?
- Bangladesh, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Central African Republic as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Bangladesh and Central African Republic?
- 0, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Central African Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Bangladesh and Central African Republic rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Bangladesh ranks 139th and Central African Republic ranks 139th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.