Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Burkina Faso: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 139th and Burkina Faso ranks 139th of 184 countries.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.42 | 18.75 | 16.67 | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
| 2010s | 37.5 | 32.81 | 4.69 | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Burkina Faso?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Burkina Faso as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Burkina Faso?
- 0, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Burkina Faso?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Burkina Faso rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 139th and Burkina Faso ranks 139th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.