Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 138th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 138th of 183 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia (Plurinational State of) | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.25 | 43.75 | 7.5 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 37.5 | 42.19 | 4.69 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of), at 37.5 against 37.5 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 138th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 138th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.