Botswana vs Brunei Darussalam: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score

Botswana
68.75
in 2013
Brunei Darussalam
68.75
in 2013
Botswana rank
47th
Brunei Darussalam rank
47th

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Botswana
  • Brunei Darussalam
0204060200420082013

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 68.75 against 68.75 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 47th and Brunei Darussalam ranks 47th of 181 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Brunei Darussalam Difference Ahead
2000s 68.75 43.75 25 Botswana
2010s 68.75 50 18.75 Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Botswana or Brunei Darussalam?
Botswana, at 68.75 against 68.75 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Botswana and Brunei Darussalam?
0, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Brunei Darussalam?
8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2013.
How do Botswana and Brunei Darussalam rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
Botswana ranks 47th and Brunei Darussalam ranks 47th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,785 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.