Burkina Faso vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 138th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 138th of 183 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.75 | 18.75 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 32.81 | 23.44 | 9.38 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Burkina Faso or Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Burkina Faso, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Burkina Faso and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Burkina Faso and Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 138th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 138th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.