Burkina Faso vs Kiribati: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Burkina Faso
37.5
in 2013
Kiribati
37.5
in 2013
Burkina Faso rank
139th
Kiribati rank
139th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Kiribati
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 139th and Kiribati ranks 139th of 184 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.75 | 37.5 | 18.75 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 32.81 | 37.5 | 4.69 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Burkina Faso or Kiribati?
- Burkina Faso, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Kiribati as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Burkina Faso and Kiribati?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Kiribati?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Burkina Faso and Kiribati rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 139th and Kiribati ranks 139th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.