Central African Republic vs Comoros: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score

Central African Republic
37.5
in 2013
Comoros
37.5
in 2013
Central African Republic rank
137th
Comoros rank
137th

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Comoros
010203040200420082013

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Comoros, a difference of 0.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 137th and Comoros ranks 137th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Comoros Difference Ahead
2000s 18.75 18.75 0
2010s 32.81 32.81 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Central African Republic or Comoros?
Central African Republic, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Comoros as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Central African Republic and Comoros?
0, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Comoros?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Central African Republic and Comoros rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
Central African Republic ranks 137th and Comoros ranks 137th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,785 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.