Central African Republic vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Democratic Republic of Congo
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 139th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 139th of 184 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Democratic Republic of Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.75 | 18.75 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 32.81 | 23.44 | 9.38 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Central African Republic or Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Central African Republic, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 139th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 139th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.