China (People’s Republic of) vs Costa Rica: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
China (People’s Republic of)
56.25
in 2013
Costa Rica
56.25
in 2013
China (People’s Republic of) rank
79th
Costa Rica rank
79th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Costa Rica
How they compare
China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 79th and Costa Rica ranks 79th of 183 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China (People’s Republic of) | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.38 | 38.54 | 4.17 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 51.56 | 53.12 | 1.56 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, China (People’s Republic of) or Costa Rica?
- China (People’s Republic of), at 56.25 against 56.25 in Costa Rica as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between China (People’s Republic of) and Costa Rica?
- 0, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Costa Rica?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Costa Rica rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 79th and Costa Rica ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.