China vs Marshall Islands: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score

China
56.25
in 2013
Marshall Islands
56.25
in 2013
China rank
78th
Marshall Islands rank
78th

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • China
  • Marshall Islands
102030405060200420082013

How they compare

China currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Marshall Islands ahead.

China ranks 78th and Marshall Islands ranks 78th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Marshall Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 34.38 31.25 3.12 China
2010s 51.56 56.25 4.69 Marshall Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, China or Marshall Islands?
China, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Marshall Islands as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between China and Marshall Islands?
0, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Marshall Islands?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
How do China and Marshall Islands rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
China ranks 78th and Marshall Islands ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,785 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.