Colombia vs Micronesia (country): Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score

Colombia
56.25
in 2013
Micronesia (country)
56.25
in 2013
Colombia rank
78th
Micronesia (country) rank
78th

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Colombia
  • Micronesia (country)
0204060200420082013

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 78th and Micronesia (country) ranks 78th of 181 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
2000s 56.25 43.75 12.5 Colombia
2010s 56.25 56.25 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Colombia or Micronesia (country)?
Colombia, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Micronesia (country) as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Colombia and Micronesia (country)?
0, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Micronesia (country)?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
How do Colombia and Micronesia (country) rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
Colombia ranks 78th and Micronesia (country) ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,785 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.