Democratic Republic of Congo vs Cote d'Ivoire: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
37.5
in 2013
Cote d'Ivoire
37.5
in 2013
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
139th
Cote d'Ivoire rank
139th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Cote d'Ivoire
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Cote d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 139th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 139th of 184 countries.
Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Cote d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.75 | 18.75 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 23.44 | 32.81 | 9.38 | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Cote d'Ivoire?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 139th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 139th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.