Democratic Republic of Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
37.5
in 2013
Guinea-Bissau
37.5
in 2013
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
137th
Guinea-Bissau rank
137th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 137th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 137th of 181 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.75 | 18.75 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 23.44 | 32.81 | 9.38 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Guinea-Bissau?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 137th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 137th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.