Democratic Republic of Congo vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 139th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 139th of 184 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.75 | 43.75 | 25 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 23.44 | 42.19 | 18.75 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 139th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 139th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.