Democratic Republic of Congo vs Palestine: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Palestine
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Palestine, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 139th and Palestine ranks 139th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.75 | 12.5 | 6.25 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 23.44 | 29.69 | 6.25 | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Palestine?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Palestine as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Palestine?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Palestine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Palestine rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 139th and Palestine ranks 139th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.