Costa Rica vs Republic of Moldova: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Costa Rica
56.25
in 2013
Republic of Moldova
56.25
in 2013
Costa Rica rank
79th
Republic of Moldova rank
79th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 79th and Republic of Moldova ranks 79th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.54 | 50 | 11.46 | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 53.12 | 51.56 | 1.56 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Costa Rica or Republic of Moldova?
- Costa Rica, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Republic of Moldova as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Costa Rica and Republic of Moldova?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Republic of Moldova?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Costa Rica and Republic of Moldova rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 79th and Republic of Moldova ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.