Côte d’Ivoire vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Côte d’Ivoire
37.5
in 2013
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
37.5
in 2013
Côte d’Ivoire rank
138th
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
138th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Côte d’Ivoire
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
How they compare
Côte d’Ivoire currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Côte d’Ivoire ranks 138th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 138th of 183 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d’Ivoire | Equatorial Guinea, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.75 | 18.75 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 32.81 | 32.81 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Côte d’Ivoire or Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
- Côte d’Ivoire, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Côte d’Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
- 0, with Côte d’Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d’Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Côte d’Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Côte d’Ivoire ranks 138th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 138th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.