Croatia vs South Korea: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score

Croatia
75
in 2013
South Korea
75
in 2013
Croatia rank
37th
South Korea rank
37th

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Croatia
  • South Korea
20304050607080200420082013

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 75 against 75 in South Korea, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 37th and South Korea ranks 37th of 181 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia South Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 47.92 70.83 22.92 South Korea
2010s 73.44 75 1.56 South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Croatia or South Korea?
Croatia, at 75 against 75 in South Korea as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Croatia and South Korea?
0, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and South Korea?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
How do Croatia and South Korea rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
Croatia ranks 37th and South Korea ranks 37th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,785 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.